BF4Central - All about Battlefield 4

Battlefield 4 M82

43

Battlefield 4 M82The Battlefield 4 M82 (aka M83A3) is a semi automatic sniper rifle which can be picked up at select spots on multiplayer maps. It’s also rumored to be part of some of the Battlefield 4 BattlePacks. The M82 in Battlefield 4 cannot be equipped, but has to be picked up in-game. Only one Battlefield 4 M82 is available per map. For example, on the Siege of Shanghai map, it’s placed at the top of the collapsible tower.

The Battlefield 4 M82 sniper rifle was previously featured in the series, but never in the multiplayer portion of the games. The rifle was originally introduced in 1980 and entered service in 1989. It’s mainly used as an anti-material rifle against light armored vehicles and fortifications.



The M82A3 is exclusively a Battle Pickup weapon, meaning that it has to be picked up on the map in order to be used (it cannot be equipped as a standard weapon).

Battlefield 4 M82 stats

The M82 rifle in Battlefield 4 is one of the most powerful rifles in the game. It’s the only rifle (so far) that fires a .50 caliber round, which is deadly against infantry and effective against light armored vehicles and aircraft. The Battlefield 4 M82 is even more deadly since it’s semi-automatic and relatively accurate.

  • Capacity: 10 rounds
  • Rate of fire: 200 RPM
  • Fire modes: semi-automatic
  • Reload time: 8.7 seconds
  • Bullet velocity: 800 m/s
  • Min damage: 80
  • Max damage: 100+
  • Weight: 14.0 KG

Similar Battlefield 4 weapons to the M82

Battlefield 4 M82 screenshots

M82 in real life:
Battlefield 4 M82 in real life

More Battlefield 4 sniper rifles

43 COMMENTS & TRACKBACKS

  1. M95Boltaction
    July 17th, 2013 at 12:59 pm

    How about just give us the M95, and equipable at that. This is just nonsense. Balance out fine in bfbc2. And no scope glare where it would realistically happen. Those will the reasons I will not purchase this game.

    • Richie
      July 18th, 2013 at 4:57 pm

      your not getting this awesome game because you don’t like two features about it?

      • Dave
        July 21st, 2013 at 9:20 pm

        Some people overreact. I just hope is, where it spawns, is somewhere badass. Like, in a MW2 campaign mission, you got to use this Rifle when you were in a building that had been destroyed in one corner and on a high story of the building. I don’t want this beast of a rifle just sitting around on ground level. I want it to be in a really cool looking sniper post type thing in a destroyed building or something.

    • Cavethug
      August 24th, 2013 at 4:49 pm

      M95? You want this beautiful semi auto .50 cal replaced with a bolt action .416 or .50? How about you get a clue first. I’m the proud owner of an M82A1 and I absolutely love the thing. It’s a far better rifle than my friends M95. Just because you are clueless when it comes to weapons, doesn’t mean everyone else is. They already have a single shot long range large caliber bolt action rifle, the M98.

      I’ll be nice and give you a little education since you obviously need it. It’s actually the Barrett M82A1 the Barrett M98 and the Barrett M95 The M95 came out before the M98. The M98 is a better rifle. Just as the M107 is a newer version of the M82A1 . Would there be a point in having the M82A1 AND the M107? No, would there be a point in having the M95 AND the M98? NO!

      People like you disgust me, they think they know ALL about guns, when in reality the closest they’ll ever get to firing a .50 cal is playing a game like this. I’m glad you won’t be playing this game, stick to the very realistic modern warfare, and call of duty games, they’re more up to your strict realistic standards LMAO

      • Recon Expert
        September 2nd, 2013 at 11:55 am

        Hey you don’t have to be a douche. He just likes the way the gun looks and works in bad company 2. He neither said that the m82 was inferior nor did he compare any of Barrett sniper/anti-material rifles with each other. He was simply saying that he doesn’t like the idea of it not being an equitable rifle. I despise people like you, who think that everyone who doesn’t know about guns is a total moron. Next time try to figure out what people are say before you even think replying.

        P.S I like the Barrett M95 from Bad Company 2. Yes, I never shot a 50 caliber before.

      • marcus
        September 2nd, 2013 at 2:56 pm

        The M95, or even the M99 would make perfect sense with one being a magazine fed bolt action and the other being a single shot, if they were worried about balance. Instead of making the semi auto M82A1 a battlefield pickup, they could give the recon class the same power, but with much slower follow up shots. Though personally, I like the idea of how they are doing it in BF4 now.

        While you are correct about the M82 and M107 being redundant, the M95 and M98B are not even close to being related. The are completely different platforms, with different calibers and different intended uses. The M98 is an anti personnel sniper rifle chambered in .338 Lapua, and the M95 is an anti materiel rifle in .50 BMG. Please enlighten me as to how that would be redundant in this game?

        If the same manufacturer and similar nomenclature are the only determining factors, then by your logic the HK 416 and 417 are pointless together, along with the M16/M4(AR-15) and the Mk11.Mod 0(AR-10).

        Not to mention the G3A3(HK91), the G53(HK53, short barreled version of HK93), and the M5K(HK94). Who cares if they are in different calibers? They are all made by HK, have similar looking receivers, some basic parts commonality, operate on the roller delayed blowback principle and all have a number between 91 and 94!

        And yes, I have shot a .50 BMG before, as well as countless other military and sporting small arms. I also personally own civilian legal variants of the G3A3, M4A1, and SKS plus many others not featured in Battlefield games. The studying, shooting, and collecting (and soon to be ‘smithing) of firearms is my passion, and the center point of my life. You don’t see me talking down to people simply because they don’t have the knowledge I do. There are lots of ways to go about correcting someone without being an asshole. You should try them out.

        • Recon Expert
          September 3rd, 2013 at 8:24 pm

          Thank you. Dont you just hate these people?

          • Sorrow
            September 20th, 2013 at 12:38 am

            Amen to that brotha. Its nice to see someone who knows what they are talking about. and I too am working towards Smithing. small world ^-^

        • Walsp112
          September 21st, 2013 at 8:43 am

          Well said *Respect*

      • hahahaYouAmuseMe
        September 20th, 2013 at 11:44 am

        You know more than everyone else don’t you? Well you don’t. Even if you DID own an M82, it doesn’t mean you know anything about shooting. As a matter of fact, .338 Lapua doesn’t happen to be a large caliber bullet. You are completely wrong. It is a .30 caliber bullet just like any other .30 caliber bullet. You are blatantly claiming that a 30 caliber bullet is the equivalent of a .50 caliber bullet.

        You don’t know anything about this. On top of it, don’t correct people who are playing a game, because you are playing it too. You shouldn’t always act like you are the most knowledgeable person in the room. It is so silly. There are no real practical advantages to a .338 round.

        Shut the hell up and don’t be an arrogant ass.

        • WhiteFeather
          September 25th, 2013 at 12:40 am

          I would much rather have my bolt action single shot Armalite 50 National Match rifle than any semi auto Barrett makes for one simple reason accuracy mine is guaranteed .7 moa at a thousand yards but my hand loads make that look like a buckshot pattern sure the barretts have racked up tons of kills in Iraq but they are designed more for stopping vehicles than being a dedicated sniper rifle and what he was saying is he would rather have a bolt action loadout equippable .50 cal than a luck of the draw finders keepers(with a few measly rounds) scavenger prize that has a massive advantage over the rest of the sniper rifles we all know that there will be ten snipers and a tank watching the pick up points for it at all times what kind of idiots ruin games with that halo crap anyway? And are you kidding me with saying a .338 round is the same as a .308 round the only way you will come even close is with a .308 230grain berger hybrid projectile launching out of a 30″ barreled 30-378 weatherby as fast as your chamber pressures will allow using H50BMG or some other extremely slow burning powder. The factory loads wouldn’t even come within the same solar system as a .338

          • WhiteFeather
            September 25th, 2013 at 12:47 am

            And ask Craig Harrison what the practical advantages of a .338 over a .308 are exactly and don’t tell me he’s lying bc he has two kills at 2800 meters with a .338 in an L96 variant. Just don’t bust on him about taking five shots to get on a stationary target when rob furlong only required 3 to kill a moving target at almost the same distance and only two shots to hit him(his backpack but same dif)

          • SHAMROCK 458
            September 30th, 2013 at 2:55 pm

            Dude its a game who gives a shit about accuracy? The guns are going to be pin point accurate on the first shot regardless of the caliber of brand name.

        • Chase
          October 4th, 2013 at 12:52 pm

          While I agree with your sentiment that this dude was a douche, there is a significant difference between any of the .30 caliber cartridges and the .338 Lapua Magnum. The .338 LM is indeed a larger diameter bullet in weights up to 300gr. .30 cal typically only go up to 220gr or so, and most of the time those heavy projectiles are reserved for the magnums (or subsonic standard capacity cartridges). When discussing the .30 cal precision rifles in this game we must talk about the 7.62×51 which will go subsonic at between 1000 and 1200 yards in the best cases, while the .338LM under ideal conditions can get to a mile or more before going subsonic. The long heavy .338 projectiles have a much better ballistic coefficient than .30 cal ones.

      • tim
        October 6th, 2013 at 7:44 pm

        You don’t own an M82, tough guy.

        -The M95 and M98B are two completely platforms
        -The M82 and M107 are the EXACT SAME platform. By that, I mean the action is the same. The M107 is just the military designation and comes with a few modification (i.e. spiked feet on the bipod).

    • NoName
      October 11th, 2013 at 1:48 pm

      I know that it would be overkill, but I would like to see the XM-109 sniper rifle appear in one of their games.

  2. Justin
    August 3rd, 2013 at 6:49 am

    i think this is a really dumb idea. everyone is just gonna flock after it. why deny snipers a good high caliber gun just because they dont wanna race everyone in the game to it.

  3. Tyben23
    August 5th, 2013 at 2:50 pm

    Why not make it last or hard rank to unlock with specific in game task.

  4. aug-user
    August 7th, 2013 at 8:26 am

    Why just one in a whole match. They should let players put it on there class. If anything, they should at least sell it. Could you imagine how much money they would make.

    • HelikopterMann
      September 3rd, 2013 at 6:31 pm

      Don’t give them any ideas…

  5. someody
    August 15th, 2013 at 2:52 am

    this gun needs to be ballanced out and allowed to equip it. or replace it with m95 from bfbc2

    • Infamous
      August 26th, 2013 at 5:17 pm

      GTFO CoD nubblet. Your kind disgusts me.

  6. thevan
    August 23rd, 2013 at 10:45 am

    the barrett.50 cal is amazing but the scope on this photo is so ugly

  7. KillerJB117
    August 23rd, 2013 at 1:19 pm

    If they any way give us an semi-auto 50. Cal then why cant we get the Barret??

  8. BL
    August 28th, 2013 at 5:13 pm

    This will be one of the first weapons they nerf because of all the people whining how fast they are dying at long range.

  9. whatsittoya
    August 29th, 2013 at 10:22 am

    I like the pickable weapons up idey as long as they cant be resuplyed with ammo and when they run out of ammo it takes say 5 min for the gun to respawn once its out of ammo and the guy using it dies and drops it

  10. Agdiaz5692
    September 7th, 2013 at 8:23 pm

    I think they should make it a class weapon but the last one in recon it’s a heavy rifle so they should just make it obscenely hard to use “over sway when not laying down and scooped in, major recoil (because even in real life it would be stupid to stand and shoot this gun off) and You can’t run as fast with it also when shot (without a silencer) I think it should appear on the map no matter how close you are I mean ive herd it shot off and have shot it and its very load bc of the caliber so point I’m just making is make it a skill gun not a noob 1 shot kill gun make it so it actual takes skill to use and player would have to use it in the game like marines and military personnel would in real life ( shit even when you shoot it standing up it puts you on your ass would be ok) plus with the amount of recoil a .50 has follow up shots (if need be) would be semi to moderately hard if not laying down with a bipod

    • Epichambonewin
      March 27th, 2014 at 2:04 pm

      Agreed. Make it so that when equipped you move slower, give it high recoil, and make it somewhat inaccurate so it discourages use against infantry, and give it high amounts of damage so it’s used to disable vehicles like it’s used in reality as an anti-material rifle.

  11. ZXmaster
    September 22nd, 2013 at 8:44 pm

    Just like “quad damage” in Quake 3.

  12. Adude
    October 27th, 2013 at 11:08 am

    @agdiaz
    I partially agree.
    Rifles in game that shoot .50 should have immense 1 hit power and less accuracy but not be so much as to make it unusable. Skill should be required, without a doubt, but if it is made as inaccurate as you say it should then I would probably be shooting an M249 without a bipod than using the M82

  13. Pablo
    October 29th, 2013 at 7:39 am

    Yesterday i bought a Battlefield 4 and i check out all of customization in battlelog…

    there is no unlock for M82 .50 barret

    M82 .50 barrett they only stays on the ground on all of the maps. It’s sounds like found a temporarily treasure, like in Diablo 3 xDD

  14. Rex
    October 29th, 2013 at 11:09 pm

    Am I the only one that has seen the assignment called “Singapore Gold (Campaign)” that unlocks the M82? I’m not sure what it unlocks it for, but the reward is the M82

    • PotatoSmasher125
      November 9th, 2013 at 9:54 am

      You unlock it for the singleplayer only if you complete the gold mission

  15. BF4 Sniper
    October 30th, 2013 at 7:52 am

    ok DICE really needs to fix the bullet velocity on snipers. I mean serously since when does an assault rifle have a greater velocity than a sniper rifle??

    • Razz
      November 2nd, 2013 at 5:28 pm

      Actually it’s quite common. Most American assault rifles are 5.56mm which is equivalent to .223 with a little extra powder pressure, which with light bullets they can easily exceed 3500fps. Most “Sniper” Rifles are based on heavier calibers but they do not go faster, in fact they generally go slower. 3000 fps is standard for sniper calibers.

      Now if we’re talking the 7.62 * 39 Russian caliber assault rifles , yes they should be slower than the sniper rifles.

    • ShadowStorm
      December 13th, 2013 at 3:25 pm

      I Know Right? The Snipers Have So Little Velocity. The Bf3 Snipers Are Fine But Not Bf4.

  16. Loid
    November 18th, 2013 at 2:30 am

    I want to have this weapon in the class, its pretty nice to shot. (and hit :) )

  17. Bear
    December 4th, 2013 at 11:31 am

    Haha you stupid nerds are so pathetic, You think you know so much about guns because you google them and read the wiki, Half the facts about this gun are so far from correct it’s not even funny…

    • Adam
      December 11th, 2013 at 7:40 am

      Thats the way of the world today. Anyone can be a weapons expert, lawyer, doctor, and mma fighter thanks to google. Just type it in and copy and paste.

    • Epichambonewin
      April 24th, 2014 at 2:25 pm

      Please, tell us abou your “extensive” knowledge of firearms and prove to use you didn’t use the internet, ’cause I sense a noob troll lurking.

  18. Adam
    December 11th, 2013 at 7:33 am

    I dont own anything by Barrett but ive spent time using a couple of their rifles, one of which was an M82. Id go with a Serbu BFG-50A over anything by Barrett. I had trouble with the scope losing zero on the barrett after awhile of shooting. The Serbu is just as powerful and more accurate i believe. Another very well made rifle (not a 50) thats worth a mention is the ERMA SR-100. The video games only feature popular stuff. Theres a lot of good stuff out there being made by smaller companies that could knock the socks off of these pricey companies merch

  19. Colton The Sniper
    May 11th, 2014 at 10:40 am

    As a big sniper in Battlefield I think it would be great for taking out LAV drivers / gunners and jeeps real quick. But I think it should be considered a gadget instead of a primary weapon, and you need to be carrying a light weight primary like a PDW, Shotgun, or Carbine maybe. Also that you can only fire it with the bipod down resting on a surface (ie ground or ledge).

    I have a friend who shot a Barrett M107 in real life, he said it left his shoulder sore for like 2 weeks just from 11 rounds. So if this could be a gadget for the Recon class I would really prefer it.

    • Colton The Sniper
      May 11th, 2014 at 10:59 am

      Not only that but the SRR-61 (Cheytac M200 Intervention) is a .408 Cheytac Caliber rifle. That’s just about as close to .50 as you can get. So if you want a .50 just use that.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>